dc.creator | Priestley, M. J. N. | |
dc.creator | Stockwell, M. J. | |
dc.date | 1978-06-30 | |
dc.identifier | https://bulletin.nzsee.org.nz/index.php/bnzsee/article/view/1097 | |
dc.identifier | 10.5459/bnzsee.11.2.110-120 | |
dc.description | The seismic design of a proposed Christchurch bridge is discussed. Initial design was based on supporting the superstructure on elastomeric bearing pads and steel-cantilever dampers. Dynamic analyses showed that the dampers were relatively ineffective, and that the seismic response
was dictated by the characteristics of the bearing pads. Final design, based on a conventional ductile approach was found to be more economical without significant increase to seismic risk. It is shown that the decision to opt for a design incorporating mechanical energy dissipators as opposed to a monolithic pier/superstructure design will not necessarily result in a reduction in seismic response. | en-US |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering | en-US |
dc.relation | https://bulletin.nzsee.org.nz/index.php/bnzsee/article/view/1097/1069 | |
dc.rights | Copyright (c) 1978 M. J. N. Priestley, M. J. Stockwell | en-US |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en-US |
dc.source | Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering; Vol 11 No 2 (1978); 110-120 | en-US |
dc.source | 2324-1543 | |
dc.source | 1174-9857 | |
dc.title | Seismic design of South Brighton bridge | en-US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
dc.type | Article | en-US |