• Login
    View Item 
    •   NZSEE Document Repository
    • New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • View Item
    •   NZSEE Document Repository
    • New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Seismic enhancement of community housings in Nepal’s mid-Himalayas: Retrofitting and reconstruction scenarios

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2026-03-04
    Authors
    Upadhyay, Magnus
    Kafle, Pradeep
    Ban, Sabin
    Khakurel, Shreedhar
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Nepal lies within the Himalayan seismic belt, making it one of the most earthquake-prone regions globally. Non-engineered masonry structures, though widely used, are highly vulnerable to seismic disasters. Replacing these structures is impractical and culturally insensitive due to their deep traditional and cultural significance. Retrofitting is a practical and culturally appropriate approach to enhance a building’s strength and safety against earthquakes. This study evaluates retrofitting and reinforcement techniques for unreinforced masonry (URM) structures in Nepal's mid-Himalayan region through numerical modelling, non-linear static analysis, and fragility assessment. Pushover analysis revealed that reconstruction models significantly improve base shear capacity compared to the URM model. Although gabion wire retrofitting has a limited effect at the initial stage, it significantly improves strength at larger displacements. Vertical reinforcements and horizontal bands in the reconstruction model consistently enhance performance. The URM model exhibits concentrated cracking near openings and corners, while the retrofitted model improves stress distribution and reduces crack widths. Additionally, the reconstruction model confines cracks within bands, preventing vertical propagation and ensuring superior structural integrity. Fragility curves reveal that reinforcement significantly enhances seismic performance, as the retrofitted model improves resistance across damage states, with exceptional collapse resistance due to its ductility, allowing energy absorption and delayed failure. The reconstruction model offers consistent protection with lower probabilities of damage across all states, underscoring its reliability during seismic events. Although the reconstruction model incurs higher costs than the retrofitted model due to its extensive reinforcement features, both models provide substantial seismic benefits compared to the base URM model.
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.1733
    Published in
    • Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Contact Us | Send Feedback