• Login
    View Item 
    •   NZSEE Document Repository
    • New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • Proceedings of the 2020 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference
    • View Item
    •   NZSEE Document Repository
    • New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
    • Proceedings of the 2020 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Prioritization of seismic retrofit using scoring system

    Thumbnail
    Download
    PDF (388.2Kb)
    Date
    2020-04-22
    Authors
    Tung, Dorian
    Lubell, Adam
    Newfield, Grant
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    As the research and engineering communities advance in their understanding of earthquakes and the associated effects, it becomes apparent that retrofit of old structures is necessary in order to protect the lives and assets of the public. Consequently, owners or stakeholders with a large inventory of buildings often ask the question: which building should be retrofitted first? A practical methodology to provide guidance on prioritization of seismic mitigation projects is proposed via a Retrofit Priority Score (RPS) that is quantitatively determined from several high-level indices. Criticality index accounts for the importance of a structure and the people affected by its loss of use. The former is measured by acceptable downtime based on business continuity and community inter-dependency, while the latter is calculated based on building area, occupant density, and occupied hours per week. Risk index reflects the deficiency of a structure relative to current seismic code requirements. Cost index addresses the economic incentive for retrofit versus replacement. All of these indices have values between zero and one, with a higher number indicating higher priority to retrofit. RPS also incorporates the seismic importance factor typically found in building codes to distinguish among normal, high-importance, and post-disaster structures. RPS does not require rigorous analysis and can be practically implemented. An example application of the proposed RPS is provided in the paper to demonstrate how it can assist in the policy, funding, and prioritization of a seismic mitigation program for a mixed-use building inventory.
    URI
    https://repo.nzsee.org.nz/handle/nzsee/1716
    Published in
    • Proceedings of the 2020 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    Entire RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Contact Us | Send Feedback